Legitimacy Framework

How we assess elections

Each race is rated on how free and fair it appears, based on the findings of internationally recognized electoral observation and democracy-monitoring bodies. Ratings reflect observer conclusions — not editorial judgement.

The five tiers

Every record carries a numeric legitimacy score (0–100) and one of five tiers, derived from the published findings of observing bodies.

Free & Fair85 – 100

Genuine competition, universal suffrage, transparent counting, equal media access, and an independent dispute-resolution process confirmed by observers.

Mostly Free70 – 84

Races meet core democratic standards but observers noted limited concerns — such as unequal media access or minor procedural issues — without altering the outcome.

Partly Free50 – 69

Significant irregularities reported: restrictions on opposition access, media bias, or administrative shortcomings that affected the competitiveness of the contest.

Not Free0 – 49

Races fell short of international democratic commitments — including systematic repression, disenfranchisement, or lack of genuine competition.

Not Yet Assessed—

No published assessment from an international observer or democracy monitor was available at the time of curation.

What observers look for

Ratings synthesize observer conclusions across the core dimensions of a democratic contest:

  • Genuine multi-party competition and the right to stand for office
  • Universal and equal suffrage, with inclusive voter registration
  • Transparent ballot counting, tabulation, and results certification
  • Equal access to media and campaign resources for all contestants
  • Independent and impartial dispute-resolution mechanisms
  • Freedom of association, assembly, and expression throughout the campaign

Assessing bodies referenced

Legitimacy notes and attributions draw from the published findings of these organizations:

OSCE / ODIHREU Election Observation MissionsUN DPPA / Electoral AssistanceOASAfrican UnionSADC / ECOWASThe Carter CenterInternational IDEAV-Dem InstituteFreedom HouseIFES

Reading the ratings

Ratings are indicative and summarize public reporting. They are not the official position of any government or observing body. A race marked Not Yet Assessed simply means no published assessment was available at the time of curation — not that the race was problematic.

During a live Campaign Period, legitimacy is not assessed until voting concludes and observers publish their findings. Annulled races are shown with their original assessment and linked to any rerun.

Always verify with your local authority

This framework is a civic tool, not an official verdict. For registration, polling stations, and certified results, consult the official election commission of the country holding the race.

Your Vote Worldwide

A civic platform tracking every national and federal election and referendum since 1900 — ongoing campaigns, upcoming votes, and archived results — with independent legitimacy assessments from international observation bodies.

© 2026 Your Vote Worldwide · Indicative curated datasetRatings summarise public reporting and are not the official position of any government. Always verify with your local electoral authority.
    base44
    Edit with Base44